The story of the lost boy raised in the wild by a pack of wolves has prolonged life on the big screen. The earliest references to back all the way to 1942, when Hungary Korda brought to live stories, Rudyard Kipling with animal snarling to make it a spectacle that led to a fourth Oscar nomination (despite winning). The latest version of the classic fairy tale came to theaters a few weeks back with the sequel has already been greenlit. It's an adaptation for Warner Bros. Is being directed by Andy Serkis, yet to be seen now been rescheduled for release in October 201 8 Mowgli, which is bound to occupy our minds for more time.


While Magic did make a great film, although the president accepted their freedom with this tale all of them successful enough to continue to invest in studio Mowgli and his animal friends? The most famous tale Jungle book dates back to 1967 when the Walt Disney Company Watch's version became a success overnight. Sadly, Walt Disney died during production of the movie never see his creation on the screen. Jungle Books, 1967 was carried out on a production budget of $ 4 million, and earned more than $ 73 million its first release in the United States alone! There will be subsequently re-released as well as a presentation on foreign income account of the movie theater has risen to $ 206 million worldwide.


Those are days that followed rushed to the studio with a sequel, prequel, and all sorts of spin-offs. So, without the further announcement on the Jungle Book by Disney. It was only in 1994 that Disney released another film with the same name, but now it is an action movie with a live old Mowgli, Jason Scott Lee. The 1994 version is a failure at the box office, the 1967 version was a success. Despite favorable reviews from film critics earning only $ 43 million at the box office as opposed to its production budget of $ 30 million - flop!


In 1997, Tristar Pictures distributed the less known version of Mowgli, entitled The Second Jungle Book: Mowgli & Baloo. It has been criticized by critics and released in theaters in North America, one quickly disappeared 100 before away with the box office negligible. In 1998, another live action film was released titled Jungle Book: Mowgli's story. But the same does not have any theatrical release; Instead, it is a film directly to video, distributed by Walt Disney Pictures.


Only in 2003 we got the film to Disney's 1967. Animated musical version, Jungle Book 2, is not the same, but still enjoy the kind of movie this decade ago. This criticism is not up to the Jungle Book 2, but the audience is not shy to visit the theater. Made on a budget of $ 20 million worldwide this movie earning $ 136 million, includes a collection of $ 48 million in North America. The film is not a spectacle of 1967. However, Jungle Book 2 is plus theater.

It's more than a decade before Disney brought a wild tale of a boy who lost time with the benefits of CGI; And experience great Jon Favreau is back. 201 6 Wild was delighted audiences around the world. It was conducted on a production budget of $ 175 million, but that figure it will recover well and offers Disney is good for profits. The movie opens with 103 million $ in North America last weekend. It has already received close to $ 400 million worldwide so far, with estimates of this weekend yet been announced. Positive reviews and streams this movie has a universal appeal of really pushing box office revenue to a number far higher in the weeks to come. It is the third version plus based on the Rudyard Kipling story that Disney has produced more than five decades ago!

Now is set Warner Bros. To enter the forest with a film adaptation India is scheduled for release in 201 8. With a gap of 2 years from the release of Disney, it would be interesting to see what difference does studios advised to make their movie stand out. For as history has shown us, even if the audience loves Mowgli and his story did not succeed every time it hits the big screen!

Share To:
Magpress

MagPress

Vestibulum bibendum felis sit amet dolor auctor molestie. In dignissim eget nibh id dapibus. Fusce et suscipit orci. Aliquam sit amet urna lorem. Duis eu imperdiet nunc, non imperdiet libero.

Post A Comment: